Open thermodynamic systems: convection and similar processes modeling by the fluids bubble boiling method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
It is continued study of convective motions in different liquid geophysical environments 7by the novel solutions bubble-boiling modeling method, suggested in [1-3].This method used with purpose of modeling of one- two- or three-dimensional convection in conditions of usual laboratory is appeared quite acceptable to consider: (a) the global planetary scale circulations; (b) surface mixed layer of oceans;(c) analogy between brittle failure and statistical physics, bubble nucleation leading to boiling; (d) peculiarities of thermal waters in northern glacial regions; (e) mantle convection in the Earth. The laboratory investigation of the subject, energetic analysis and details will be reported on other occasions.
Article Details
References
1. Gvelesiani A.. J. On the one-dimensional two-phase/many-component convective flows in different geophysical mediums: laboratory method of modeling of fluids bubble boiling. Georgian Geophys. Soc., 2013, v.16B, pp. 119-128.
2. Gvelesiani A., Chiabrishvili N. Laboratory modeling of thermals generation in geophysical environments by means of fluid bubble boiling method. J. Georgian Geophys. Soc., 2013, v.16B, pp. 129-137.
3. Gvelesiani A., Chiabrishvili N. Additional experiments about investigation of the peculiarities of the bubble boiling of clear water, H2O, and sugar, С12Н22О11, and edible salt, NaCl, water solutions of different densities. J. Georgian Geophys. Soc., 2014, v.17A, pp.
4. Gvelesiani A., Chiabrishvili N. Definition of admixture mass content density of Tbilisi thermal waters by the new laboratory fluids bubble boiling method. J. Georgian Geophys. Soc., 2014, v. 17B, pp.
5. Timashev S. F. On the base principles of “New dialog with nature”. Problems of geophysics of the 21st century, I book, RAN OIFZ im. O.Yu.Shmidta. M.: Nauka, 2003, pp. 104-141.
6. Pielke R. A. Sr. Influence of the spatial distribution of vegetation and soils on the prediction of cumulus convective rainfall. Reviews of Geophysics, 39, 2 / May 2001, pp.151-177.
7. Arora V. Modeling vegetation as a dynamic component in soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer schemes and hydrological models. Reviews of Geophysics, 40, 2 / June 2002, pp. 1-26.
8. Smith R. K. The role of cumulus convection in hurricanes and its representation in hurricane models. Reviews of Geophysics, 38, 4 / November 2000, pp. 465-489.
9. Gvelesiani A. I. On the convective motions in different geophysical media. J. Georgian Geophys. Soc., 2012, v.15B, pp. 52-64.
10. Marshall J., Schott F. Open-ocean convection: observations, theory, and models. Reviews of Geophysics, 37, 1 / February 1999, pp. 1-64, 98RG02739
11. Gukhman A. A. Using of similarity method theory to the study of heat-mass processes exchange. M.: Vysshaya Shkola, 1967, 304 pp.
12. Roberts M. J., Jökulhlaups: A reassessment of floodwater flow through glaciers. Reviews of Geophysics, 2005, 43, RG1002/ 2005, pp. 1-21..
13. Jellinek A. M., Manga M. Links between long-lived hot spots, mantle plumes, , and plate tectonics. Reviews of Geophysics, 2004, v. 42, RG3002, pp. 1-35.
14. Rundle J. B. , Turcotte D. L., Shcherbakov R., Klein W., Summis Ch. Statistical physics approach to understanding the multiscale dynamics of earthquake fault system. Reviews of Geophysics, 2003, v. 41, N 4, RG4001, pp. 5.1-5.30.
15. Bunn Ch. Crystals: their role in nature and in science. 1964, Academic Press, New York and London. (1970, M.: Mir, pp. 312 (in Russian))
16. Shafranovsky I. I. Lectures on crystals-morphology. 1968, M.: Vysshaya Shkola, 174 pp.
17. Popov G. M. Shafranovsky I. I. Crystallography. M.: Vysshaya Shkola, 352 pp.
18. Pavlov V. I. Mechanics. Molecular physics. M.: GTTL, 1955, 356 pp.
19. Wallis G. B. One-dimensional two-phase flow. McGraw-Hill. Book Company. New York et al.(1972, M.: Mir, 440 pp.) (in Russian).
20. Advances in Heat Transfer. (Eds Irvine T. F., Jr, Hartnett J. P.), 1964, v. 1, Academic Press-New York-London (Problemy Teploobmena,1967, M.: Atomizdat, 336 pp.) (in Russian).
21.Tao W.-K. J., S. Lang, W. S. Olson, R. Meneghini, S. Yang, J. Simpson, C. Kimmerow, E. Smith, and Halverson J. Retrieved vertical profiles of latent heat release using TRMM rainfall products. J. Appl. Meteorol., 2001.
22. Minobe S., Y. Kanamoto, N. Okada, H. Ozawa, and M. Ikeda. Plume Structures in Deep Convection of Rotating Fluid. Nature, 2000, 19, pp. 395-396.
23. Schimokawa S., Ozawa H. On the thermodynamics of the oceanic general circulation: Irreversible transition to a state with higher rate of entropy production. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 2002, 128, pp. 2115-2128.
24. Gvelesiani A. I. On the convective motions in different geophysical mediums. J. GeorgianGeophys. Soc., 2012, v.15B, pp. 52-64.
25. Ozawa H., Ohmura A., Lorenz R. D., Pujol T. The second law and the global climatesystem: a review of the maximum entropy production principle. Reviews of Geophysics,41, 4 / December 2003, pp. 1-24.
26. Chashechkin Yu. D. Dissipative effects in hydrodynamics of non-homogeneous geosphere.Problems of geophysics of the 21st century, First book. RAN OIFZ im. O. Yu. Shmidta. M.:Nauka, 2003, pp. 66-103.
27. Brown R. A. Analytical methods in planetary boundary-layer modeling. Adam Hilger, London, 1972 (Russian ed., Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1978, 150 pp.)
28. Smokowski E. W. Calculus with analytic geometry. Prindle, Weber &Schmidt, Boston, Massachusetts.Second edition, 1979, 1085 pp.
29.Curie M. Pier Curie. Nauchn. khim.-tekhn. Izd., Leningrad, 1924.