SOME METHODS OF ANALYZE GEODYNAMIC IMFUCT ON THE DEEP AQUIFARE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
During hydro-geodynamical observation on the territory of Georgia has fixed various anomalies in water level before earthquakes. Revealing of the mechanism of interrelation between the deformation processes, forestall strong earthquakes, and a hydrodynamic variation of underground waters, would allow to explain such preliminary behavior of hydrodynamic effects and to develop scientifically proved methods of the forecast of earthquakes. For a select of a correct method the comparative analysis of various methods of processing has been carried out in view of all possible working factors. One of methods based on the idea, that aquifer property (porosity and conductivity) is changing during the geodynamic strass. According Results during normal period it change according tidal variation and has “background” value, but during the seismic event changed the porosity, as indicator of tectonic activity.
Article Details
References
1. Bella, Biagi P., Melikadze G. et al. - Anomalies in geophysical and geochemical parameters revealed on the occasion of the Paravani (M=5.6) and Spitak (M=6.9) earthquakes (Caucasus). Amsterdam, Tectonophysics 202 Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.,1992, p.p. 23-41
2. P. A. Hsieh, I. D. Bredehoeft, I. M. Farr. Determination of Aquifer Transmissivity from Earth Tide Analysis. Water resources research. vol. 23. 10. 1987, p.p. 1824-1832.
3. P. A. Hsieh, I. D. Bredehoeft, S. A. Rojstaczer. Response of Well-Aquifer Systems to Earth Ties: Problems Revisited. Water resources Research vol. 24. No. 3. 1988, p.p. 468-472.
4. Melikadze G., Popov E. A technique of Hydro-geological supervision with the purposes of the forecast earthquake on territory of Georgia. A series geology «Gruziinti» N7, 1989.
5. Melikadze G., Adamchuk Y, Todadze M Search informational harbingers of earthquakes on the territory Georgia. A series Geology «Gruziinti» N10, P., 1989
6. Melikadze G., Matcharashvili T., Chelidze T., Ghlonti E. Earthquake related disturbance in stationarity of water level variation. Bulletin of the Academy of sciences of the Georgian, 165 № 1, 2002
7. Melikadze G., Buntebarth G., Chelidze T. Hydrodynamic and microtemperature monitoring in seismic areas. Georgian Engineering News, # 3, 2004 , p.p 12-132
8. Melikadze G., Matcharashvili T., Chelidze T. Nonlinear analysis of dynamics of water level variation in Georgia during increased regional seismic activity. Book – Time-Dependent microtemperature and hydraulic signals associated with tectonic/seismic activity. Printed by Institute of Geophysics; European Center “Geodynamical hazards of high dams ” of open partial agreement on major disasters, council of Europe; Editors: G. Buntebarth, T. Chelidze, Tbilisi, 2005.
9. Rojstaczer S. Intermediate period response of water wells to crustal strain: Sensitivity and noise level, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 13,387-12,402. 1988.
10. Timofeev V. and al. Assessment post-seismic deformation of environment fracture parameters on the base water level variation in the borehole, Physic of Earth, 2012, № 7–8, с. 89–102 i)