Real time telemetric monitoring system of large dams and new methods for analysis of dam dynamics
Main Article Content
ანოტაცია
We created the Early Warning Telemetric System for Dam Diagnostics (DAMWATCH), which consists of sensors (tiltmeters), terminal and central controllers connected by the GSM/GPRS Modem to the diagnostic center. The dam tilt data for varying reservoir load will be compared to (static) design model of dam deformation computed by finite element method (FEM). Besides, recently developed nonlinear data analysis and prediction schemes may help to quantify fine dynamical features of dam behavior. The corresponding software package DAMTOOL is developed.
The differences between characteristics of real (measured) and theoretically predicted data may signal either abnormal behavior of the object or some deficiencies in theoretical model. The data obtained already during exploitation of the system show interesting long-term and short-term patterns of tilts in the dam body, which can be used for dam diagnostics. Proposed complex of real-time telemetric monitoring (DAMWATCH) and nonlinear dynamical analysis system (DAMTOOL) has no analogues worldwide.
Article Details
წყაროები
Abashidze, V. 2001. Geophysical Monitoring of Geodynamical Processes at Enguri Dam. Tbilisi. Aba-shidze, V., Chelidze, T., Tsaguria, T., Kobakhidze, T.. Results of research, carried out on Enguri HPP by tiltmeters. Energy, N 1, 2008, Tbilisi (in Georgian).
Analysis and assessment of the state of Enguri HPP and its foundation, recommendations for improving reliability and safety of its exploitation.
Automated Dam Monitoring Systems. 2000. Bulletin of International Committee of Large Dams. N 118.
Bartsh M., Schiess Zamora, A., Steiger K.M. 2011.Continuous Dam Monitoring: an essential basis for re-liable back-analysis. Hydropower&Dams. 18, 51-56
Analysis and assessment of the state of Enguri arch dam and its founation, recommendations for strengthening reliability and safety of exploitation. Center of geodynamical surveys in energy domain. Hydroproject and Tbilhydroproject. Moscow-Tbilisi. 2008 (in Russian).
Chelidze, T., Kolesnikov, Yu., Matcharashvili, T. 2006.Seismological criticality concept and
percolation model of fracture. Geophysical Journal International. 164, 125-136.
Chelidze, T., Matcharashvili, T. , Abashidze, V., Kalabegashvili, M. 2011, Real time
telemetric monitoring system of large dams. In: Proceedings of Int. Symposium”Dams
and Reservoirs under changing challenges - CD-papers. (Eds. A. Shleiss, R. Boes), CD_01.
Engineering Guidelines for the evaluation of the Hydropower projects. 1999. Chapter 11- Arch dams. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Division of Dam Safety and Inspections. Washington, DC 20426.
Emukhvari, N, Bronshtein, V. 1991. Inguri HPP – system of allowable and limiting parameters of arch dam state for operative control of its safety during exploitation. Ministry of Energy USSR. Moscow-Tbilisi.
Guyer, R &Johnson, P. 2009. Nonlinear Mesoscopic Elasticity. Wiley-VCH.
Hill, R. 1965. A self-consistent mechanics of composite materials. J.Mech.Phys.Solids, 13, 213-223.
Holzhausen, G. 1991. Low cost automated detection of precursors to dam failure: Coolidge dam, Ari-zona. 8th Annual Conference ASDSO, San Diego.
Press, W. et al. 1996. Numerical Recipes. Cambridge University Press.
Kantz, H&Schreiber, T., 1997. Nonlinear time series analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Marwan, M., 2003. Encounters with neighborhood, PhD Thesis.
Matcharashvili T., Chelidze, T., Peinke, J. 2007. Increase of order in seismic processes around large re servoir induced by water level periodic variation, Nonlinear Dyn.DOI 10.1007/s11071-007-9219-0.
Matcharashvili T., T. Chelidze, V. Abashidze, N. Zhukova and E. Meparidze. 2010. Changes in Dy-namics of Seismic Processes Around Enguri High Dam Reservoir Induced by Periodic Variation of Water Level. in: Geoplanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences, Volume 1, 2010, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12300-9; Synchronization and Triggering: from Fracture to Earthquake Processes. Eds.V.de Rubeis, Z. Czechowski and R. Teisseyre, pp.273-286.
McCall, K& Guyer, R. 1994.Equation of state and wave propagation in hysteretic nonlinear elastic ma-terials. J. of Geophys. Res., B99, 23 887-23897.
Mivenchi M.R., Ahmadi M.T., Hajmomeni A.2003. Effective technique for Arch Dam Ambient Vibra-tion Test. JSEE, 5, 23-34.
Monitoring of Dams and their foundations. 1989. Bulletin of Intern.Committee of Large Dams. N 68.
Peinke, J., Matcharashvili, T., Chelidze, T., et al. 2006. Influence of periodic variations in water level on regional seismic activity around a large reservoir. Phys. Earth&Planetary Interiors, 156, 130–142.
Savich, A. et al. 2002. Complex engineering-geophysical investigations at construction of hydropower objects. Moscow, Nedra, (in Russian).
Savich, A. et al. 2006. Safety of large dams in areas of high geodynamical risk. In “Geodynamical Stud-ies of Large Dams” Tbilisi, (in Russian).
Sprott, J. S., 2006. Chaos and Time Series Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Strogatz, S., 2000. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Westreview Press.
Wieland, M. 2005. Stress management. International water power&dam construction. March, 32-36.
Zienkiewicz, O. 2000. The Finite Element Method. Butterworth-Heinemann.